Teamwork vs Wrike: Complete Comparison (2026)
Choosing between Teamwork and Wrike is a common decision for project management buyers in 2026. Both Teamwork and Wrike are established players, founded in 2007 and 2006 respectively. Teamwork serves 20K+ orgs users while Wrike has 20K+ orgs users globally. Teamwork differentiates with task management and time tracking, while Wrike leads with gantt charts and resource management. In this head-to-head comparison, Teamwork earns a higher hiltonsoftware.co score of 88/100 — but the right choice depends on your specific needs, budget, and team size.
Quick Comparison
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Pros & Cons at a Glance
After comparing Teamwork and Wrike across features, pricing, and user satisfaction, Teamwork takes the lead with a score of 88/100 versus Wrike's 84/100. Teamwork's key advantages include "built-in time and billing" and "great for agencies". That said, Wrike has its own strengths — particularly "enterprise-ready features" — making it a viable alternative for specific use cases.
Both Teamwork and Wrike offer free plans, lowering the barrier to entry. Teamwork's paid plans start at $10.99/user/mo while Wrike begins at $9.80/user/mo. Evaluate which paid features — Invoicing, Client portals (Teamwork) vs Proof & approval, Time tracking (Wrike) — justify upgrading for your team.
Bottom line: Choose Teamwork if you need agencies that need to track time and bill clients. Go with Wrike if your priority is enterprise teams needing resource and workload management. Both are strong project management tools — we recommend trying the free plan of each before committing.
Agencies that need to track time and bill clients.
Enterprise teams needing resource and workload management.