Front vs Hiver: Complete Comparison (2026)
Choosing between Front and Hiver is a common decision for customer support buyers in 2026. Both Front and Hiver are established players, founded in 2013 and 2011 respectively. Front serves 9K+ orgs users while Hiver has 10K+ orgs users globally. Front differentiates with shared inbox and sequences, while Hiver leads with shared gmail inbox and email assignment. In this head-to-head comparison, Front earns a higher hiltonsoftware.co score of 90/100 — but the right choice depends on your specific needs, budget, and team size.
Quick Comparison
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Pros & Cons at a Glance
After comparing Front and Hiver across features, pricing, and user satisfaction, Front takes the lead with a score of 90/100 versus Hiver's 90/100. Front's key advantages include "feels like regular email" and "great for high-volume team email". That said, Hiver has its own strengths — particularly "works inside gmail natively" — making it a viable alternative for specific use cases.
On pricing, there's a clear difference: Hiver offers a free plan, making it more accessible for individuals and small teams exploring customer support solutions. Front starts at $19/user/mo with no free tier, but often justifies the cost with shared inbox and sequences.
Bottom line: Choose Front if you need operations teams managing high-volume shared email with collaboration. Go with Hiver if your priority is gmail-first teams wanting shared inbox help desk without leaving gmail. Both are strong customer support tools — we recommend trying the free plan of each before committing.
Operations teams managing high-volume shared email with collaboration.
Gmail-first teams wanting shared inbox help desk without leaving Gmail.