Filebase vs Hetzner Storage Box: Complete Comparison (2026)

Updated: March 12, 20268 min read

Choosing between Filebase and Hetzner Storage Box is a common decision for cloud storage buyers in 2026. Hetzner Storage Box has been in the market since 1997, giving it a 21-year head start over Filebase (founded 2018). Filebase serves 10K+ users while Hetzner Storage Box has 500K+ users globally. Filebase differentiates with ipfs pinning and s3-compatible api, while Hetzner Storage Box leads with sftp and rsync access and samba/cifs support. In this head-to-head comparison, Hetzner Storage Box earns a higher hiltonsoftware.co score of 90/100 — but the right choice depends on your specific needs, budget, and team size.

🗄️
Filebase
Cloud Storage
84
hiltonsoftware.co Score
VS
📦
Hetzner Storage Box
Cloud Storage
90
hiltonsoftware.co Score
RECOMMENDED

Quick Comparison

Filebase
Hetzner Storage Box
Starting Price
$5.99/mo
$3.81/mo (1TB)
Free Plan
Yes
No
Users
10K+
500K+
Founded
2018
1997
Rating
4.2/5
4.5/5
Best For
Web3 developers wanting decentralized, S3-compatib...
European businesses and developers wanting cheap, ...

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FilebaseHetzner Storage Box
88Ease of Use92
92Features91
93Value for Money87
82Customer Support83
87Integrations84
83Scalability88
91Learning Curve88

Pros & Cons at a Glance

Filebase
+Decentralized redundancy
+Affordable pricing
-Niche use case
-Less documentation
Hetzner Storage Box
+Extremely affordable pricing
+European data hosting (GDPR)
-No desktop sync client
-Technical setup required
AI Verdict

After comparing Filebase and Hetzner Storage Box across features, pricing, and user satisfaction, Hetzner Storage Box takes the lead with a score of 90/100 versus Filebase's 84/100. Hetzner Storage Box's key advantages include "extremely affordable pricing" and "european data hosting (gdpr)". That said, Filebase has its own strengths — particularly "decentralized redundancy" — making it a viable alternative for specific use cases.

On pricing, there's a clear difference: Filebase offers a free plan, making it more accessible for individuals and small teams exploring cloud storage solutions. Hetzner Storage Box starts at $3.81/mo (1TB) with no free tier, but often justifies the cost with sftp and rsync access and samba/cifs support.

Bottom line: Choose Filebase if you need web3 developers wanting decentralized, s3-compatible object storage. Go with Hetzner Storage Box if your priority is european businesses and developers wanting cheap, reliable storage with sftp. Both are strong cloud storage tools — we recommend trying the free plan of each before committing.

CHOOSE FILEBASE IF:

Web3 developers wanting decentralized, S3-compatible object storage.

CHOOSE HETZNER STORAGE BOX IF:

European businesses and developers wanting cheap, reliable storage with SFTP.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Filebase better than Hetzner Storage Box in 2026?
Hetzner Storage Box scores 90/100 on hiltonsoftware.co compared to Filebase's 84/100. Filebase stands out for "decentralized redundancy" and is best for Web3 developers wanting decentralized, S3-compatible object storage. Hetzner Storage Box is known for "extremely affordable pricing" and suits European businesses and developers wanting cheap, reliable storage with SFTP. Your specific workflow and team size should guide the decision.
What is the pricing difference between Filebase and Hetzner Storage Box?
Filebase offers a free plan while Hetzner Storage Box starts at $3.81/mo (1TB), making Filebase the more budget-friendly option. When comparing value, consider that Filebase (founded 2018, 10K+ users) includes features like IPFS pinning, S3-compatible API, Sia and Storj networks. Hetzner Storage Box (founded 1997, 500K+ users) offers SFTP and rsync access, Samba/CIFS support, Automated snapshots. The right choice depends on which features matter most to your team.
What are the main differences between Filebase and Hetzner Storage Box?
The key differences come down to focus and approach. Filebase excels at IPFS pinning, S3-compatible API, Sia and Storj networks, while Hetzner Storage Box focuses on SFTP and rsync access, Samba/CIFS support, Automated snapshots. Filebase's main advantage is "decentralized redundancy", though some users note "niche use case". Hetzner Storage Box's strength is "extremely affordable pricing", but "no desktop sync client" can be a drawback. Both serve the Cloud Storage market but target different user profiles.
Can I switch from Filebase to Hetzner Storage Box?
Switching between Filebase and Hetzner Storage Box is possible since both operate in the Cloud Storage space. Before migrating, export your data from Filebase and check Hetzner Storage Box's import capabilities. Key features to verify compatibility: IPFS pinning, S3-compatible API, Sia and Storj networks (Filebase) vs SFTP and rsync access, Samba/CIFS support, Automated snapshots (Hetzner Storage Box). Consider running both tools in parallel during a trial period to ensure a smooth transition.
Which is better for small teams: Filebase or Hetzner Storage Box?
For small teams, Filebase has an advantage with its free plan, letting you get started without financial commitment. Filebase is best for Web3 developers wanting decentralized, S3-compatible object storage. Hetzner Storage Box (starting at $3.81/mo (1TB)) may be worth the investment if your team specifically needs SFTP and rsync access, Samba/CIFS support, Automated snapshots.

Explore More Comparisons & Tools