nTask vs Teamwork: Complete Comparison (2026)
Choosing between nTask and Teamwork is a common decision for project management buyers in 2026. Teamwork has been in the market since 2007, giving it a 9-year head start over nTask (founded 2016). nTask serves 250K+ users while Teamwork has 20K+ orgs users globally. nTask differentiates with task management and meeting management, while Teamwork leads with task management and time tracking. In this head-to-head comparison, Teamwork earns a higher hiltonsoftware.co score of 88/100 — but the right choice depends on your specific needs, budget, and team size.
Quick Comparison
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Pros & Cons at a Glance
After comparing nTask and Teamwork across features, pricing, and user satisfaction, Teamwork takes the lead with a score of 88/100 versus nTask's 84/100. Teamwork's key advantages include "built-in time and billing" and "great for agencies". That said, nTask has its own strengths — particularly "very affordable" — making it a viable alternative for specific use cases.
Both nTask and Teamwork offer free plans, lowering the barrier to entry. nTask's paid plans start at $3/user/mo while Teamwork begins at $10.99/user/mo. Evaluate which paid features — Risk tracking, Time tracking (nTask) vs Invoicing, Client portals (Teamwork) — justify upgrading for your team.
Bottom line: Choose nTask if you need small teams wanting affordable project management with meeting tracking. Go with Teamwork if your priority is agencies that need to track time and bill clients. Both are strong project management tools — we recommend trying the free plan of each before committing.
Small teams wanting affordable project management with meeting tracking.
Agencies that need to track time and bill clients.