Mattermost vs Spike: Complete Comparison (2026)
Choosing between Mattermost and Spike is a common decision for team communication buyers in 2026. Both Mattermost and Spike are established players, founded in 2015 and 2014 respectively. Mattermost serves 800K+ users while Spike has 1M+ users globally. Mattermost differentiates with self-hosted deployment and channels, while Spike leads with conversational email and group chat. In this head-to-head comparison, Spike earns a higher hiltonsoftware.co score of 88/100 — but the right choice depends on your specific needs, budget, and team size.
Quick Comparison
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Pros & Cons at a Glance
After comparing Mattermost and Spike across features, pricing, and user satisfaction, Spike takes the lead with a score of 88/100 versus Mattermost's 86/100. Spike's key advantages include "turns email into chat seamlessly" and "no migration needed". That said, Mattermost has its own strengths — particularly "full data control" — making it a viable alternative for specific use cases.
Both Mattermost and Spike offer free plans, lowering the barrier to entry. Mattermost's paid plans start at $10/user/mo (cloud) while Spike begins at $5/user/mo. Evaluate which paid features — DevOps integrations, Compliance tools (Mattermost) vs Video calls, Collaborative notes (Spike) — justify upgrading for your team.
Bottom line: Choose Mattermost if you need enterprises needing data sovereignty and self-hosting. Go with Spike if your priority is teams wanting chat-style communication without leaving their email inbox. Both are strong team communication tools — we recommend trying the free plan of each before committing.
Enterprises needing data sovereignty and self-hosting.
Teams wanting chat-style communication without leaving their email inbox.