Matomo vs Redash: Complete Comparison (2026)
Choosing between Matomo and Redash is a common decision for analytics & bi buyers in 2026. Matomo has been in the market since 2007, giving it a 6-year head start over Redash (founded 2013). Matomo serves 1.4M+ websites users while Redash has 50K+ users globally. Matomo differentiates with web analytics and heatmaps, while Redash leads with sql editor and dashboards. In this head-to-head comparison, Matomo earns a higher hiltonsoftware.co score of 88/100 — but the right choice depends on your specific needs, budget, and team size.
Quick Comparison
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Pros & Cons at a Glance
After comparing Matomo and Redash across features, pricing, and user satisfaction, Matomo takes the lead with a score of 88/100 versus Redash's 86/100. Matomo's key advantages include "full data ownership and privacy" and "feature-rich ga alternative". That said, Redash has its own strengths — particularly "free and open-source" — making it a viable alternative for specific use cases.
Both Matomo and Redash offer free plans, lowering the barrier to entry. Matomo's paid plans start at $23/mo (cloud) while Redash begins at Free (self-hosted). Evaluate which paid features — Session recordings, Self-hosting (Matomo) vs Scheduled queries, Alerts (Redash) — justify upgrading for your team.
Bottom line: Choose Matomo if you need organizations needing full-featured, gdpr-compliant web analytics they own. Go with Redash if your priority is data teams wanting a free, sql-based dashboard tool they can self-host. Both are strong analytics & bi tools — we recommend trying the free plan of each before committing.
Organizations needing full-featured, GDPR-compliant web analytics they own.
Data teams wanting a free, SQL-based dashboard tool they can self-host.