Hive vs Wrike: Complete Comparison (2026)
Choosing between Hive and Wrike is a common decision for project management buyers in 2026. Wrike has been in the market since 2006, giving it a 9-year head start over Hive (founded 2015). Hive serves 10K+ orgs users while Wrike has 20K+ orgs users globally. Hive differentiates with task management and time tracking, while Wrike leads with gantt charts and resource management. In this head-to-head comparison, Hive earns a higher hiltonsoftware.co score of 90/100 — but the right choice depends on your specific needs, budget, and team size.
Quick Comparison
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Pros & Cons at a Glance
After comparing Hive and Wrike across features, pricing, and user satisfaction, Hive takes the lead with a score of 90/100 versus Wrike's 84/100. Hive's key advantages include "all-in-one project management" and "good resourcing tools". That said, Wrike has its own strengths — particularly "enterprise-ready features" — making it a viable alternative for specific use cases.
Both Hive and Wrike offer free plans, lowering the barrier to entry. Hive's paid plans start at $12/user/mo while Wrike begins at $9.80/user/mo. Evaluate which paid features — Resourcing, Proofing and approvals (Hive) vs Proof & approval, Time tracking (Wrike) — justify upgrading for your team.
Bottom line: Choose Hive if you need teams wanting project management with built-in resourcing and time tracking. Go with Wrike if your priority is enterprise teams needing resource and workload management. Both are strong project management tools — we recommend trying the free plan of each before committing.
Teams wanting project management with built-in resourcing and time tracking.
Enterprise teams needing resource and workload management.