Hetzner Storage Box vs Wasabi: Complete Comparison (2026)
Choosing between Hetzner Storage Box and Wasabi is a common decision for cloud storage buyers in 2026. Hetzner Storage Box has been in the market since 1997, giving it a 20-year head start over Wasabi (founded 2017). Hetzner Storage Box serves 500K+ users while Wasabi has 50K+ users globally. Hetzner Storage Box differentiates with sftp and rsync access and samba/cifs support, while Wasabi leads with s3-compatible api and no egress fees. In this head-to-head comparison, Hetzner Storage Box earns a higher hiltonsoftware.co score of 90/100 — but the right choice depends on your specific needs, budget, and team size.
Quick Comparison
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Pros & Cons at a Glance
After comparing Hetzner Storage Box and Wasabi across features, pricing, and user satisfaction, Hetzner Storage Box takes the lead with a score of 90/100 versus Wasabi's 90/100. Hetzner Storage Box's key advantages include "extremely affordable pricing" and "european data hosting (gdpr)". That said, Wasabi has its own strengths — particularly "no egress or api fees" — making it a viable alternative for specific use cases.
Neither Hetzner Storage Box nor Wasabi offers a free plan. Hetzner Storage Box starts at $3.81/mo (1TB) and Wasabi at $6.99/TB/mo. For the investment, Hetzner Storage Box delivers sftp and rsync access and samba/cifs support, while Wasabi provides s3-compatible api and no egress fees.
Bottom line: Choose Hetzner Storage Box if you need european businesses and developers wanting cheap, reliable storage with sftp. Go with Wasabi if your priority is developers and media companies storing large amounts of data affordably. Both are strong cloud storage tools — we recommend trying a trial of each before committing.
European businesses and developers wanting cheap, reliable storage with SFTP.
Developers and media companies storing large amounts of data affordably.