Height vs Hive: Complete Comparison (2026)
Choosing between Height and Hive is a common decision for project management buyers in 2026. Both Height and Hive are established players, founded in 2020 and 2015 respectively. Height serves 3K+ orgs users while Hive has 10K+ orgs users globally. Height differentiates with ai task automation and multiple views, while Hive leads with task management and time tracking. In this head-to-head comparison, Height earns a higher hiltonsoftware.co score of 90/100 — but the right choice depends on your specific needs, budget, and team size.
Quick Comparison
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Pros & Cons at a Glance
After comparing Height and Hive across features, pricing, and user satisfaction, Height takes the lead with a score of 90/100 versus Hive's 90/100. Height's key advantages include "ai-native design" and "fast and modern interface". That said, Hive has its own strengths — particularly "all-in-one project management" — making it a viable alternative for specific use cases.
Both Height and Hive offer free plans, lowering the barrier to entry. Height's paid plans start at $8.50/user/mo while Hive begins at $12/user/mo. Evaluate which paid features — Attributes, Real-time collaboration (Height) vs Resourcing, Proofing and approvals (Hive) — justify upgrading for your team.
Bottom line: Choose Height if you need tech-forward teams wanting ai-assisted project management. Go with Hive if your priority is teams wanting project management with built-in resourcing and time tracking. Both are strong project management tools — we recommend trying the free plan of each before committing.
Tech-forward teams wanting AI-assisted project management.
Teams wanting project management with built-in resourcing and time tracking.