Filebase vs Internxt: Complete Comparison (2026)
Choosing between Filebase and Internxt is a common decision for cloud storage buyers in 2026. Both Filebase and Internxt are established players, founded in 2018 and 2020 respectively. Filebase serves 10K+ users while Internxt has 2M+ users globally. Filebase differentiates with ipfs pinning and s3-compatible api, while Internxt leads with zero-knowledge encryption and open-source clients. In this head-to-head comparison, Internxt earns a higher hiltonsoftware.co score of 86/100 — but the right choice depends on your specific needs, budget, and team size.
Quick Comparison
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Pros & Cons at a Glance
After comparing Filebase and Internxt across features, pricing, and user satisfaction, Internxt takes the lead with a score of 86/100 versus Filebase's 84/100. Internxt's key advantages include "open-source and audited" and "strong privacy commitment". That said, Filebase has its own strengths — particularly "decentralized redundancy" — making it a viable alternative for specific use cases.
Both Filebase and Internxt offer free plans, lowering the barrier to entry. Filebase's paid plans start at $5.99/mo while Internxt begins at $4.49/mo. Evaluate which paid features — Sia and Storj networks, Georeplication (Filebase) vs Photo backup, File sharing (Internxt) — justify upgrading for your team.
Bottom line: Choose Filebase if you need web3 developers wanting decentralized, s3-compatible object storage. Go with Internxt if your priority is privacy advocates wanting open-source, zero-knowledge encrypted cloud storage. Both are strong cloud storage tools — we recommend trying the free plan of each before committing.
Web3 developers wanting decentralized, S3-compatible object storage.
Privacy advocates wanting open-source, zero-knowledge encrypted cloud storage.