Gather vs Microsoft Teams (Meetings): Complete Comparison (2026)
Updated: March 7, 20268 min read
VS
Quick Comparison
Gather
Microsoft Teams (Meetings)
Starting Price
$7/user/mo
$6/user/mo
Free Plan
Yes
Yes
Users
10M+
300M+
Founded
2020
2017
Rating
4.5/5
4.2/5
Best For
Remote teams wanting a fun, persistent virtual off...
Microsoft 365 organizations needing integrated ent...
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
GatherMicrosoft Teams (Meetings)
92Ease of Use86
94Features88
94Value for Money88
85Customer Support79
87Integrations81
88Mobile App82
AI Verdict
Gather leads with a SoftScout Score of 90 vs 84 for Microsoft Teams (Meetings). Gather is best suited for Remote teams wanting a fun, persistent virtual office for daily presence, while Microsoft Teams (Meetings) excels for Microsoft 365 organizations needing integrated enterprise video meetings. Both are strong options in the Video Conferencing space.
CHOOSE GATHER IF:
Remote teams wanting a fun, persistent virtual office for daily presence.
CHOOSE MICROSOFT TEAMS (MEETINGS) IF:
Microsoft 365 organizations needing integrated enterprise video meetings.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Gather better than Microsoft Teams (Meetings)?
Gather scores 90/100 on SoftScout compared to Microsoft Teams (Meetings)'s 84/100. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs. Gather is best for Remote teams wanting a fun, persistent virtual office for daily presence. Microsoft Teams (Meetings) is best for Microsoft 365 organizations needing integrated enterprise video meetings.
Does Gather have a free plan?
Yes, Gather offers a free plan. Paid plans start from $7/user/mo.
Does Microsoft Teams (Meetings) have a free plan?
Yes, Microsoft Teams (Meetings) offers a free plan. Paid plans start from $6/user/mo.
Can I migrate from Gather to Microsoft Teams (Meetings)?
Migration between Gather and Microsoft Teams (Meetings) depends on the specific features you use. Both tools are in the Video Conferencing category. Check each tool's import/export options for data portability before switching.